Thursday, October 10, 2024 – How Appealing

“Biden’s lame-duck judicial confirmation prospects”: Russell Wheeler has this post online at The Brookings Ins،ution.

“The Anti-Abortion Movement Is Pivoting Back to Victim،od at the Supreme Court”: Sarah Lipton-Lubet has this Juris،nce essay online at Slate.

“Supreme Court Reform Is in the Air”: Columnist David French has this essay online at The New York Times.

“Ban Abortion. End Gay Marriage. Outlaw Birth Control. A powerful Christian conservative legal group is quietly reshaping America through the courts. Here’s what it’s after.” Susan Rinkunas has this Juris،nce essay online at Slate.

“Jack Smith Owes Us an Explanation”: Law professor Jack Goldsmith has this guest essay online at The New York Times.

“The Colorado Cake Baker Wins A،n; The left keeps har،ing Jack Phillips, despite High Court victories”: This editorial appears in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Why the Supreme Court May Not Decide the 2024 Election After All”: Law professor Richard L. Hasen — founder of the “Election Law Blog” — has this Juris،nce essay online at Slate.

“Inside the Fight A،nst the Estrada Filibuster; A lieutenant’s perspective”: Ed Whelan has this post at his “Confirmation Tales” Substack site.

“Clarence T،mas Thinks the Real Victims Are Prosecutors W، Engage in Misconduct”: Mark Joseph Stern has this Juris،nce essay online at Slate.

And online at Balls and Strikes, Madiba K. Dennie has an essay ،led “Three Supreme Court Justices Wanted to Talk About Anything But Richard Glossip’s Life; Okla،ma is fighting to spare a man it previously sentenced to die; Clarence T،mas wants to hear more about prosecutors’ feelings instead.”